﻿WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.209 --> 00:00:02.725
<v ->"Based on the 11th
Amendment to the Constitution,</v>

2
00:00:02.725 --> 00:00:06.047
The Supreme Court does not
have the authority to..."

3
00:00:07.217 --> 00:00:11.257
The most important words
in this question are

4
00:00:11.257 --> 00:00:13.253
"Based on the 11th Amendment..."

5
00:00:13.253 --> 00:00:13.989
So we need to understand,

6
00:00:13.989 --> 00:00:16.433
what is the 11th Amendment?

7
00:00:16.433 --> 00:00:18.335
The 11th Amendment concerns itself with

8
00:00:18.335 --> 00:00:20.799
State's sovereign immunity.

9
00:00:20.799 --> 00:00:24.823
Basically stating that a ruler or a state

10
00:00:24.823 --> 00:00:28.517
cannot be implicated in
a criminal act, etc.,

11
00:00:28.517 --> 00:00:31.933
because of its sovereign immunity.

12
00:00:31.933 --> 00:00:33.438
That it has the ultimate power

13
00:00:33.438 --> 00:00:36.518
within its own entity, etc.,

14
00:00:36.518 --> 00:00:40.202
and esentially giving
states rights over their

15
00:00:41.172 --> 00:00:43.230
power within the state.

16
00:00:43.230 --> 00:00:46.745
So, we're looking for
a answer that has to do

17
00:00:46.745 --> 00:00:49.126
with a violation of state's immunity.

18
00:00:50.316 --> 00:00:54.028
"A. Overrule decisions
made by a Federal judge."

19
00:00:54.028 --> 00:00:56.748
The Supreme Court can overrule decisions

20
00:00:56.748 --> 00:00:58.252
made by a Federal Judge because

21
00:00:58.252 --> 00:01:01.900
it is the Supreme Court in the land

22
00:01:01.900 --> 00:01:04.812
and it is a Federal, the
supreme federal court.

23
00:01:04.812 --> 00:01:08.012
So A is out simply
because it has to do with

24
00:01:08.012 --> 00:01:11.230
a Federal Judge, nothing
to do with the State.

25
00:01:11.230 --> 00:01:12.938
Remember that the 11th
Amendment has to do with

26
00:01:12.938 --> 00:01:14.187
State's sovereign immunity.

27
00:01:15.077 --> 00:01:17.283
"B. Overrule decisions made
by a State Supreme Court."

28
00:01:18.224 --> 00:01:20.421
Well, the word State here makes us assume

29
00:01:20.421 --> 00:01:22.442
"Oh, well here you go!"

30
00:01:23.462 --> 00:01:25.975
The Supreme Court can't overrule

31
00:01:25.975 --> 00:01:27.785
State Supreme Court decisions

32
00:01:27.785 --> 00:01:29.625
because there's State's
sovereign immunity.

33
00:01:29.625 --> 00:01:32.272
That's untrue, because
if a State Supreme Court

34
00:01:32.272 --> 00:01:34.721
makes a ruling that is unconstitutional,

35
00:01:34.721 --> 00:01:37.793
the Constitution is the
Supreme Law of the land,

36
00:01:40.003 --> 00:01:42.843
and nothing can violate the Constitution.

37
00:01:42.843 --> 00:01:45.623
And the Supreme Court has

38
00:01:45.623 --> 00:01:48.083
Judicial Review over all laws

39
00:01:48.083 --> 00:01:51.296
or all rulings by judicial branch,

40
00:01:51.296 --> 00:01:52.640
by an executive branch,

41
00:01:52.640 --> 00:01:54.299
or by a legislative branch,

42
00:01:54.299 --> 00:01:56.539
to see if any of these actions or rulings

43
00:01:56.539 --> 00:01:58.875
goes against the Constitution.

44
00:01:58.875 --> 00:02:00.689
If something is unconstitutional,

45
00:02:00.689 --> 00:02:02.875
the Supreme Court has
the right to overrule it.

46
00:02:02.875 --> 00:02:04.762
So, B is out.

47
00:02:04.762 --> 00:02:08.219
"C. Hear any suits brought
against the State."

48
00:02:08.219 --> 00:02:10.032
In this case we're talking about

49
00:02:10.032 --> 00:02:13.339
the legality of the State's power.

50
00:02:13.339 --> 00:02:16.027
If another person, a private citizen

51
00:02:16.027 --> 00:02:19.746
or another state has an argument.

52
00:02:19.746 --> 00:02:21.489
This is basically stating that

53
00:02:22.769 --> 00:02:25.789
because of State's sovereign immunity,

54
00:02:25.789 --> 00:02:29.241
no cases can be heard against the State.

55
00:02:29.241 --> 00:02:31.768
The Supreme Court doesn't have that power.

56
00:02:31.768 --> 00:02:35.367
Particularly if the state
itself hasn't given consent

57
00:02:35.367 --> 00:02:39.201
to be brought in a suit against it.

58
00:02:39.201 --> 00:02:41.217
So C seems the most likely answer,

59
00:02:41.217 --> 00:02:43.147
because of the fact it has to deal

60
00:02:43.147 --> 00:02:45.307
with the State's sovereign immunity.

61
00:02:46.144 --> 00:02:49.057
"D. Prosecute those
serving in public offices."

62
00:02:49.057 --> 00:02:51.744
This generally has to
do with private citizens

63
00:02:51.744 --> 00:02:54.017
who happen to be serving
in public offices.

64
00:02:54.017 --> 00:02:59.017
For example, you can bring up
a case against Richard Nixon,

65
00:02:59.073 --> 00:03:01.953
but not the President
of the United States.

66
00:03:01.953 --> 00:03:02.881
And yes,

67
00:03:02.881 --> 00:03:05.089
the Supreme Court does have that power.

68
00:03:05.089 --> 00:03:06.977
Since this answer is not talking about

69
00:03:06.977 --> 00:03:09.569
a particular state office,

70
00:03:09.569 --> 00:03:13.367
it's not talking about the
State's sovereign immunity,

71
00:03:13.367 --> 00:03:15.367
it is wrong.

72
00:03:15.367 --> 00:03:17.882
And therefore, C is the correct answer.

